Get instant quotes on custom 3D printed parts in a wide range of engineered materials. From concept models to production components, order directly online with free shipping on all domestic orders.
Additive manufacturing represents a fundamental shift in how parts come into existence. Rather than starting with raw material and removing excess through subtractive processes, additive techniques build geometry incrementally. Material deposits precisely where needed, which eliminates traditional constraints around complexity, undercuts, and hollow sections.
This approach opens design possibilities that traditional manufacturing closes off. Engineers can incorporate internal geometries, flowing curves, and topology-optimized structures without the cost penalties that subtractive methods impose. The economic model reverses—complexity costs less, not more.
The technology operates across multiple physical principles. Some processes use focused laser energy to fuse powdered material. Others deposit liquid resin and cure it with ultraviolet light. Still others extrude heated thermoplastic through moving nozzles. Each approach offers distinct advantages for different application categories.
Powder-Based Thermoplastic Systems
Selective laser sintering (SLS) uses a scanning laser to selectively fuse polymer powder particles. The process doesn't require support structures—unfused powder surrounding the part provides support during printing. Once the part builds, powder removal reveals the finished geometry.
The practical advantage is significant. Parts emerge from SLS with excellent mechanical properties comparable to injection-molded plastics. Nylon specifically offers impact resistance, flexibility, and durability suitable for functional end-use components. Surface finish is naturally textured but acceptable for most applications. Feature detail is excellent, enabling functional mechanisms with moving parts, snap fits, and precision clearances.
HP Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) operates on similar principles but uses heating and chemical agents rather than laser sintering. The result is faster production cycles and finer surface quality compared to traditional SLS. Part strength remains excellent. MJF has become increasingly popular for applications where production volume justifies the equipment investment.
Resin-Based Photopolymer Systems
Stereolithography (SLA) uses ultraviolet laser light to cure liquid photopolymer resin. Parts build platform-up, requiring support structures that attach to the model. Once printing completes, support removal reveals the final part.
The primary advantage is surface quality and geometric precision. SLA delivers fine detail resolution difficult to achieve with powder systems. Surface finish emerges glossy and smooth, suitable for visual prototypes and appearance models. Dimensional accuracy exceeds powder-based alternatives when tolerances matter.
The mechanical properties differ from powder systems. Resin materials offer less impact resistance and lower heat tolerance compared to sintered nylon. This makes SLA excellent for visual evaluation and conceptual prototyping, but less suitable for functional parts requiring structural load resistance.
PolyJet technology deposits tiny quantities of photopolymer and UV-cures material at each deposition point. Multiple material types can be deposited simultaneously in a single build, enabling part assemblies with integrated overmolds, embedded rigid cores, or dual-hardness surfaces in one production cycle.
Filament Extrusion Systems
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) heats thermoplastic to semi-liquid state and extrudes it through a moving nozzle. Material cools and solidifies as it deposits, building layers sequentially.
FDM excels with large components. Build platforms often accommodate parts several feet in dimension. Material costs remain modest. The trade-off is lower resolution and surface quality compared to other technologies. Wall thickness requirements are thicker to maintain structural integrity. Feature details resolve less crisply.
FDM finds highest value in building large, blocky parts where surface finish and precision aren't critical. Interior support structure can be more challenging to remove than in other technologies. For applications where the part is primarily aesthetic and geometry is not intricate, FDM offers best value.
Metal Systems
Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) uses laser energy to fuse metal powder particles. The result is dense, strong metal parts suitable for functional applications. Aerospace and medical industries rely heavily on DMLS for components where material properties must match production specifications.
The advantage is accessing metal geometries impossible with traditional subtractive machining. Complex cooling channels within engine components, optimized structural topology reducing weight, integrated assemblies eliminating fasteners—these designs become manufacturable.
The limitation is cost. DMLS equipment is expensive, and metal powder materials exceed plastic material costs substantially. Per-part pricing makes DMLS viable for low production volumes or highly complex geometries where alternative methods require extensive machining.
Metal binder jetting uses inkjet technology to selectively deposit binding agent onto metal powder. After printing, parts require sintering in a furnace to achieve final density and strength. The process enables broader material selection and lower powder costs compared to DMLS, but typically delivers lower strength and density.
Standard Engineering Plastics
Nylon remains the most versatile choice for functional prototyping and production parts. The material offers good strength, excellent fatigue resistance, and reasonable chemical compatibility. Parts survive repeated cycling without degradation. The material machines reasonably well if secondary finishing becomes necessary.
Polyurethane materials provide elastomeric properties in 3D-printed form. These flex and stretch rather than fracturing, suitable for gaskets, seals, and vibration isolation. Hardness can be tuned across a range, enabling dual-shore components in single builds.
Polycarbonate offers clarity and impact resistance. For applications requiring optical transparency or high impact toughness, polycarbonate properties deliver where other plastics fail. Cost is higher than standard nylon.
Performance Plastics
High-temperature polymers like ULTEM withstand sustained exposure to elevated temperatures without dimensional change or strength degradation. Aerospace and automotive applications depend on these materials for engine compartment components and other thermally demanding locations.
Glass-filled nylon variants improve rigidity and heat resistance compared to unfilled nylon. The trade-off is reduced impact toughness and slightly reduced dimensional precision due to glass fiber orientation during printing.
Specialized Requirements
Flame-retardant materials meet FAA and other aviation standards for combustibility testing. Parts printed in flame-retardant nylon or ULTEM qualify for regulatory requirements in aerospace cabins and cargo holds.
Biocompatible materials exist for medical device applications. These have undergone testing to ensure compatibility with human tissue and blood, essential for implantable or skin-contact devices.
Electrically conductive materials enable parts incorporating electronic functionality. These materials bridge the gap between circuit design and mechanical form.
Additive manufacturing tolerances differ fundamentally from subtractive methods. The layered building process introduces directional effects. Horizontal dimensions typically hold tighter tolerances than vertical dimensions. Wall thickness variation affects dimensional stability.
Part size influences achievable precision. Small features can resolve to 0.030" detail when the part dimensions are modest. Large components naturally accumulate greater tolerance stack across their span. Post-processing operations like annealing or heat treatment can improve dimensional stability after printing.
Support material removal and cleaning procedures influence final surface quality. Aggressive cleaning removes support residue but can damage fine details. Conservative approaches preserve precision but may leave visible support attachment points.
Rapid Iteration Capability
Printing directly from CAD files eliminates tooling time. Design changes reflect in production within hours or days, not weeks. For product developers evaluating geometric variations, this speed advantage compresses development timelines dramatically.
Complex Geometry Without Cost Penalty
Undercuts, internal channels, hollow sections, and topology-optimized structures add minimal cost compared to simpler geometries. This inverts the traditional design-for-manufacturability paradigm. Designers can solve functional requirements with intricate form rather than designing-down to manufacturing simplicity.
Functional Integration
Multiple parts can assemble into single monolithic builds. Moving mechanisms can incorporate snap fits and articulation. Color and material properties can vary across single components. This integration reduces assembly labor and fastener requirements.
Low Production Risk
Early production runs remain economically feasible. Whether you need ten parts or ten thousand, the per-part cost scales differently than in traditional tooling. This enables production validation with smaller initial volumes.
Material Diversity
The range of available materials continues expanding. New formulations address market needs—conductive materials, impact-enhanced variants, sustainable biopolymers. This diversity enables material selection optimized for specific application requirements rather than settling for generic compromises.
Product Development
Designers validate ergonomic assumptions, assembly sequences, and aesthetic proportions through functional prototypes. Testing with actual materials under realistic conditions reveals design issues before production commitment.
End-Use Manufacturing
Customized components for specialized applications come directly from additive manufacturing without production tooling. Medical implants tailored to patient anatomy, dental restoration with individual-specific geometry, and aerospace components with topology-optimized structure represent applications where customization justifies direct manufacturing.
Legacy Product Support
Obsolete components become manufactureable again through additive technology. Replacement parts for equipment no longer in production can be fabricated to specification without inventory storage costs.
Assembly Fixtures and Tooling
Custom jigs, fixtures, and holding devices are rapidly produced for assembly lines and manufacturing operations. The low tooling cost enables application-specific solutions rather than compromising with universal alternatives.
Orientation and Support Planning
How a part positions during printing affects strength, finish quality, and support material requirements. Thoughtful orientation balances these competing factors. Parts can be printed strongest in load-bearing directions by aligning layers appropriately.
Wall Thickness Minimization
Thin walls consume less material and print faster, but excessive thinness creates structural weakness and manufacturing failures. Typical minimums are 0.040" to 0.060" depending on geometry and material. Abrupt thickness transitions create stress concentration—gradual transitions distribute loads more evenly.
Feature Accessibility
Internal features must be reachable for support removal. Blind pockets and enclosed voids require special consideration. Temporary escape routes for internal support material sacrifice some design optimization for manufacturing feasibility.
Stress Concentration Avoidance
Sharp corners and tight radii concentrate stress. Generous radii throughout designs improve part durability under cyclic loading. Transitions between different thicknesses benefit from tapered geometry rather than abrupt steps.
Choose based on dominant requirement. Surface quality and dimensional precision? SLA. Large-scale geometry? FDM. Functional strength and durability? SLS or MJF. Metal properties essential? DMLS. Multiple materials in one build? PolyJet.
Many sophisticated applications benefit from polyurethane elastomers rather than rigid plastics, or from metal-filled variants providing structural enhancement. Specialized requirements demand material-specific solutions.
The decision framework considers not just the part itself but the broader application context. Is this a one-off visualization? A pre-production functional test? A bridge solution filling production gap? A final-use component? Each scenario points toward different technology and material choices.
Define the fundamental requirement driving your additive manufacturing need. Are you exploring geometric concepts, validating functionality, manufacturing production quantities, or solving a specific material challenge? This clarity guides process and material recommendations.
Prepare your design geometry in standard CAD format. The file quality directly influences printing accuracy and cost. Models should be manifold geometry with no internal voids or self-intersecting surfaces—these conditions cause printing failures.
Communicate functional and aesthetic requirements clearly. Dimensional tolerances, surface finish expectations, color specifications, and post-processing preferences all influence final results and cost.
Advanced additive manufacturing has matured from experimental technology to reliable manufacturing platform. The capability exists to transform your design concepts into functional physical reality at speed and cost inaccessible even a few years ago.
